Lands and their rulers, occupiers and refugees, ordinary people
seeking security: the very stuff of geo-politics. That’s what the bible is about.
Many of you will remember the services here led by Jan Pickard
last November. She brought a first-hand
report of the indignities and oppression suffered by
the West Bank Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis who have a built a tall
thick wall of separation around their illegally-occupied settlements among the
Palestinians farms and orchards.
Many of you will have sent or received Christmas cards with images
of Bethlehem: indeed some of these will have been Bible Lands Cards. Some of
you, like us, will have been to the Holy Land, where much of the action in the
biblical narratives was located.
The land of Israel is of central religious importance for
Christians and Muslims. Jerusalem, its
ancient capital, is the birthplace of Christianity and the third-holiest city
to Islam. But tonight I want to focus on
Israel as the “promised land” of the Jews. I will take a biblical approach that has
important relevance for the politics of our world today.
The
first 11 chapters of Genesis, compiled and edited into
the form in which we presently know them in translation from the Hebrew, are a
striking and memorable series of myths. Myths
about the creation of the world, about clashes of culture and language, and
about a dawning understanding of the nature of a God who protects and favours
his people, while both demanding loyalty but also punishing disobedience. The characters of these storybook people of
God – from Adam, through Cain and Abel, to Noah and his sons – are
personifications of the earliest human response to Yahweh’s reaching out to his
creatures.
But
when we get to chapter 12 in the Book of Genesis, we are beginning to get into
the realm of history: pre-history at least, with vague and distorted memories
of ancient patriarchs and warriors who had been actual tribal leaders in the
far-distant past. At the very least, the narrative is being told
as if it were history. Abram is probably
the earliest actual person represented in the Jewish Bible, and he had lived
far away in Mesopotamia. But our reading
from Genesis 12 relates the germ of the idea that the destiny of Abram’s family
was to be fulfilled neither in Ur of the Chaldees,
nor in Haran in modern Turkey, but in Canaan – the Holy Land. The story tells of a call from God to Abram
to “go forth to a land that I will show
you, where I will make you a great nation, and where you will be a blessing.[1]” Abram obeyed his God and “it was reckoned to him as righteousness[2]”.
He uprooted his whole family with all their possessions and all their
slaves. They went south to Canaan, and
there God said, “To you and your
descendants I will give this land[3]”. The land that God had promised: the Promised Land.
Could
Abram rely on this promise? He needed to
be sure, because it wasn’t going to be easy to lay claim to this fertile land
that was already settled by half a dozen other tribes who weren’t going to give
it up lightly. So Abram asked God for
confirmation of the promise. The story
relates[4]
that God (who had already made a rainbow covenant with Noah) made a Covenant
with Abram in a ceremony over a smoking fire-pot and sacrificial animals
saying, "To your descendants I
have given this land, From the river of Egypt as far as the great
river, the river Euphrates: the Kenite and the Kenizzite and the Kadmonite and the Hittite and the Perizzite and the Rephaim and the
Amorite and the Canaanite and the Girgashite and the Jebusite." No
matter who was here before you, it will all be yours, as far as the eye can
see: nay further. From
the Nile to the Euphrates, virtually the whole of the known world. What a story; what a promise: what a
covenant! Their own
land as a gift from God.
In
fact, Abram didn’t stay long in Canaan.
He continued south to Egypt and prospered there before returning with
Lot his nephew. The two of them soon realise that with all their
flocks and herds and tents there are now too many of them to occupy the same
territory. They decide to separate. Abram generously gives Lot the first choice,
and Lot chooses the fertile land beyond the Jordan leaving Abram with the dust
of Canaan. Abraham’s descendants became
the Jews, while Lot’s became the Arabs. With the benefit of hindsight, Lot chose
the oilfields and Abraham was left with the sand. But at least it was their promised land.
The rest of Genesis is mostly about Abram’s son Isaac and his sons
Esau and Jacob, and Jacob’s son Joseph who also went down to Egypt. The Hebrew nation spent years there and
suffered oppression and slavery, and it fell to Moses to bring about their
great deliverance in the Exodus. As
another holy book puts it: ‘Moses said unto his people, 'O my people, go into the Holy Land, which Allah hath
ordained for you. [5]'‘ So
again they came out of Egypt and towards the Promised Land in
Canaan which was still occupied by Canaanites and other tribes. After years of wandering and fighting, years
of quarrelling and disobedience, and further covenants with God, Moses and his
people finally approached their land of milk and honey from the east, from beyond
the Jordan.
From Pisgah’s height, Moses could see it all stretched before him
across the river. But he was not
permitted to march them all in. Great
leader though he was, Moses’ lack of faith was punished by God and he died just
short of the Promised Land and was buried in an unmarked grave. God had made them no easy promise!
Occupation and Loss
Moses had commissioned
Joshua to be his successor. "Be
strong and courageous, for you shall bring the sons of Israel into the land
which I swore to them, and I will be with you.[6]" But
Joshua had to battle for years to establish the Hebrews amongst the
Canaanites: despite the promise, they
didn’t have easy ride! But they were
successful, and after many battles and adventures a flourishing nation was
established under King David who acceded to the new throne in 1000 BC. That was the only time they got anywhere near
to occupying an area of land approaching the ancient
promise of boundaries at the Nile and the Euphrates. The covenants that God
made with David were not to do with land but with the ark and with the temple:
it looked as though the ancient promise to Abram had been now kept and the land
was indeed secure.
But no, it was not to be.
David’s successors quarrelled amongst themselves and the kingdom was
divided in 925 BC: Israel in the north and Judah in the south. Some rulers were righteous-and-just, but many
others like Ahaz “did not do what was right in the sight of the LORD his God, as his
father David had done[7]”. They were not keeping their side of the covenant, and
they lost their Promised Land. First Israel
and then Judah were overwhelmed by the Assyrians, and the Jews were finally taken
captive in Babylon in 586 BC: their homes and temple destroyed, their land
gone. Their chief lament was,”How shall we sing the LORD's song in a strange land[8]?”
But their exile was not
to last for long. While the Jews were in
Babylon, the Assyrians themselves were conquered by the Persians, and it was
Cyrus the Persian King who came to their rescue. “The LORD stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, that
he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, and put it also in writing,
saying, 23Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, All the kingdoms of the earth
hath the LORD God of heaven given me; and he hath charged me to build him an
house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all his
people? The LORD his God be with him, and let him go up.[9]” So in 538 BC they returned to their land, and
to Jerusalem; and under their leaders Ezra and Nehemiah they rebuilt the walls
and they rebuilt the temple. They were
back home, back in possession of the Promised Land again. But would the promise last?
Alas, not for long. Judah had a succession of occupations over
the next 500 years: Persians, Greeks, and then Seleucids. Under the Maccabeans
they enjoyed a brief spell of semi-independence but then in 63 BC the Roman Emperor
Pompey marched in and took over, and a mere hundred and thirty-three years after
that Jerusalem and its Temple were destroyed in the Roman-Jewish war. Two thousand years of history from the
promise to Abram to the destruction of the Temple and the dispersion of the
Jews. And so then for the almost next
2000 years the Promised Land was neither occupied nor controlled by the Jewish
people: they were dispersed throughout the world. Christian churches were built in Jerusalem
from the 2nd century, and in the 7th century it became
instead one of the holy cities of Islam.
In the 12th and 13th centuries the
Crusades were fought unsuccessfully to restore Christian control of the Holy Land
and eventually Palestine came under the control of the Ottoman Empire. No
longer a great Jewish nation. No longer a blessing to the world. A covenant given but not kept. A promise made but a promise lost.
Contemporary restoration
We’ll
fast-forward now to 1917 when a major decisive change in the fortunes of the
Jews occurred. Another promise was made
and another covenant signed.
Arthur
James Balfour had been Conservative Prime Minister from 1902-1905, and was
Foreign Secretary in David Lloyd George’s coalition government during WW1. His eponymous declaration is his main claim to
fame: and it has indeed changed world history.
After the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1922, Britain was awarded a
mandate over Palestine and was therefore able to bring Balfour’s bold plan to
fruition. Another
Cyrus?
And
so the State of Israel was inaugurated on 14 May 1948. A homeland for
a million dispersed Jews was created, and once again millions of Palestinians
were displaced to make way for them. Was
this the final return to the Promised Land? Can the Genesis story of God’s promise to Abram
be used in our generation to justify the consequences of this radical political
action? Can we deny the Jewish claim
that they have a divine right to that land?
If
you take a simple view of the OT as being the literal truth, then that claim is
valid and the contemporary consequences are justifiable. God promised the land to the Jews; they took
it by force originally from the Canaanites and no-one complained; they have got
back the land after losing it and should now use every means to retain their
rightful inheritance because it is God-given.
That’s what the United Torah Judaism Party in the Knesset believes, and
what many religious Jews believe. Do we?
Is it as simple as that?
Could
it be that Abram, Moses and Joshua got the wrong idea? Did the later writers and editors of the OT
chronicles re-write the oral history of the Jews and invent stories about a
promise to show their predecessors in a better light? Or, on the other hand, are we wrong to
quibble at the apparent immorality of both ancient and modern Jewish peoples in
forcibly occupying the lands belonging to other groups who were living there
already?
Let’s
look briefly at what the NT has to say about it all. How many times do we find references to
“Promised Land” or “Holy Land” there? Very
few indeed: the emphasis
is rather on distancing the Christian gospel from the actions and attitudes of
the Jews of old, like our Gospel reading from Matthew[10]
which seems to challenge the Jews’ behaviour as tenants of God’s land. And tonight’s Epistle[11]
re-interprets Abraham’s wandering as a search for a city whose foundations,
design and builder are God’s. His faith
was indeed commended, but it is made clear that he and his descendants after
him never received the real land that was promised. The author of Hebrews believed that the focus
of God’s promise was not an earthly city at all, nor a geographical land, but rather
a heavenly country in which an eternal city has been prepared for them.
So when
Christians, seeking to gain God’s Promised Land, follow in Moses’ steps and
view their Canaan from Pisgah’s height, what they see is not a territory to be
fought over and conquered, not a land to be plundered and settled, but a land
of pure delight, a veritable heaven.
Life’s pilgrimage will be hard, perilous and tiring but the promise of
God will sustain us till we reach the eternal shore, landing safe on Canaan’s
side.
Let’s conclude with the words of Charles Wesley’s hymn[12]
with which we started this service. It
talks of a new Jerusalem. It puts a new light on the Promised Land; a
light that comes from the love of God and from our life in Christ:
“Zion’s God is all our own/ who on his love rely;
We his pardoning love have known/ and live to Christ and die.
To the new Jerusalem/ he our faithful
guide shall be.
Him we claim, and rest in him/ through all eternity.” Amen